Items Or Skill?

[DaWarns]

imo a player should be judged on how well they handle there char. (Skill)

not on how hard they can hit bcos of what they are wearing. (items)

wouldn't it be nice if certain ppl (no names) didn't think they have to act like they are betta than some of us just bcos of kit

when kits are equal pvp comes down to skill.

just a little rant b4 bed, what do you think?

[QueenOfWizzies]

i think your spot on.

[Daz]

I've said this from day 1 - on Highrate my kit was poo - though I still put a good fight up with people over 300 dc

Though good kit obviously helps ><

Reason I liked 1.9 - there was no slow/pa it was all bound on skill

Arnage

[Desire]

Why don't we have a big proper PvP event? where the GM gives everyone a set of items to wear and stuff, so that we can see how people are, based on SKILL only

[Daz]

I did one a week back - but wasn't massive about 10 people took part maybe more.

Arnage

[jaffar91]

yeh warriors PA is just ridiculous, better than a taos poison -.-

[Desire]

not really, wud need like PA+20 to even last half aslong as tao poison, ok its alot stronger but id rather be hurt alot for a short time, than medium amount for a long long time.

[Desire]

I did one a week back - but wasn't massive about 10 people took part maybe more.

Arnage

yeh i know, i won it :P

/pinkthunder

[Orphan]

not really, wud need like PA+20 to even last half aslong as tao poison, ok its alot stronger but id rather be hurt alot for a short time, than medium amount for a long long time.

PA+3 is more powerful than Tao poison. Granted it doesn't last long but when you're hitting a mob continuasly it more or less is always poisoned.


And DaWarns yes I agree with you, but getting a good kit (without donation) requires skill also .

[Desire]

yeh i know pa is stronger, but in a PvP situation, you need high amounts of PA for it to actualy matter, cus pa+3 wont last long, and as a war u don't get in many hits in a pvp.