The use of Rude avitars

[pob1111]

its been brought up in a forum topic.
the use of rude forum avitars are no longer permitted as they are viewd as abusive to some members of the forum.
plz remove all rude avitars and replace with another of your choosing.

ok to clear things up over the rude avatars am removing them asap so pls dont anyone else think about choosing to use one

also editing it out of this thread

[lapta]

This was my fault.
Uploaded like 8000+ and only scanned them quickly.
The offanding pics will be removed, and any one caught using them will be banned on the forums

[Dave]

Ven's Edit - yes dave but flaming a member of forum staff is not a wise idea even if it is me your on about take it on the chin just bud.

My Edit - people who need their avatar's changed - CbaLiek, جبسي حديدة ,

[Chalky2007]

Ven's Edit - yes dave but flaming a member of forum staff is not a wise idea even if it is me your on about take it on the chin just bud.

My Edit - people who need their avatar's changed - Chalkey2007, CbaLiek, جبسي حديدة ,

bah u grass me in u spud -_-

[pob1111]

bah u grass me in u spud -_-

no tbh your avitar is fine and does not need changing.
dave i think your missing the point.
theres a line between ok and just down right rude and from the 6000 avitars u could have choosen u choose 2 of the rudest u could.
u no what is rude and what is not.if i see any that are deemed as rude they will recieve infractions and there avitars removed.

my definaition of rude is an avitar that shows or implys a sexual activity.this is what has been causing offence to some members of the forum.

[Dave]

no tbh your avitar is fine and does not need changing.
dave i think your missing the point.
theres a line between ok and just down right rude and from the 6000 avitars u could have choosen u choose 2 of the rudest u could.
u no what is rude and what is not.if i see any that are deemed as rude they will recieve infractions and there avitars removed.

my definaition of rude is an avitar that shows or implys a sexual activity.this is what has been causing offence to some members of the forum.

so a smurf sucking off a tit isn't provocative like this person's? ----> جبسي حديدة ,
or Cbaliek having tits up front isn't?

[Chalky2007]

so a smurf sucking off a tit isn't provocative like this person's? ----> جبسي حديدة ,
or Cbaliek having tits up front isn't?

no becasue sum1 standing there holding their OWN body parts isnt sexual activity -.- its their OWN body

[Dave]

no becasue sum1 standing there holding their OWN body parts isnt sexual activity -.- its their OWN body

that being said then I can have one of me holding my cock then wouldn't be bad then yeah?

Tbh I'd rather have ZERO sexual content on the forum that way there's no way to argue about it.

[CbaLiek]

my avatar is not rude is it?
this would be allowed in a magazine for all age's as it does not show her beautiful nips

[Atrox]

Dave is right, instead of being stupid noobs trying to decide whether or not your pic is "sexual content" or not, take it off, put it as ure desktop wallpaper and dream on there instead of having it on a public forums which people under the age of 18 go on :P